Wednesday, September 24, 2014

Conde v. Abaya [March 23, 1909]

Facts:
·         Casiano Abaya died in 1899 unmarried however leaving two unaknowledged children by Paula Conde. The two children died as minors in 1902 and 1903. The mother sued for the settlement of the intestate estate of Casiano along with the acknowledgment of the two as natural children of the deceased.
·         The trial court, with the opposition of the Roman Abaya, brother of the deceased, rendered judgment bestowing the estate of Casiano to Conde as legitimate heir of the decedent's natural children.
Issues:
1. WON an ordinary action for the acknowledgment of natural children may be brought in special probate proceedings. (YES)
·         Section 782 of the Code of Civil Procedure:
o    If there shall be a controversy before the Court of First Instance as to who the lawful heirs of the deceased person are, or as to the distributive share to which each person is entitled under the law, the testimony as to such controversy shall be taken in writing by the judge, under oath, and signed by the witness. Any party in interest whose distributive share is affected by the determination of such controversy, may appeal from the judgment of the Court of First Instance determining such controversy to the Supreme Court, within the time and in the manner provided in the last preceding section.P3ach3s

2.  WON the mother of a natural child now deceased, but who survived the person who, it is claimed, was his natural father, also deceased, may bring an action for the acknowledgment of the natural filiation in favor of such child?  in order to appear in his behalf to receive the inheritance from the person who is supposed to be his natural father. (NO) #peaches

·         The power to transmit the right of such action by the natural child to his descendants cannot be sustained under the law, and still less to his mother.

CIVIL CODE RULES FOR FILIATION

Legitimate Child
Illegitimate Child
Period when it can be filed
·         Lasts during the whole lifetime of the child (NCC 118)
·         E: Within 5 years should the child die (NCC 118)
o    Minor
o    Insane

·         GR: Lasts ONLY during the lifetime of the presumed parent
·         E:
o    Presumed parent died during the minority of the child [within 4 years]
o    An instrument where the parent expressly acknowledged the child [six months after discover] (NCC 137)
Who may bring the action
·         GR: Child himself
·         E: Transmitted to its heirs should the child die:
o    Minor
o    Insane
o    Child dies after instituting the action
·         Code is silent


·         The court concluded that the right is not transmissible to the heirs of the natural child by the following argument: It cannot place a natural child on a better position by assuming that the right is transmitted to the heirs as a general rule when it only grants exceptions to a legitimate child

Torres Dissenting Opinion:
·         While for those of the natural child, there is no provision in the code authorizing the same, although on the other hand there is none that prohibits it. As a solution, the right of action to claim acknowledgment of a natural child is transmitted by analogy to his heirs on the same conditions and terms that it is transmitted to the descendants of the legitimate child under article 118, but no more.
·         Since the children died while they were minors, they should be allowed to file an action.







Side Notes:

FAMILY CODE RULES FOR FILIATION[1]

Legitimate Child
Illegitimate Child
Period when it can be filed
·         Lasts during the whole lifetime of the child (FC 173)
·         E: Within 5 years should the child die (FC 173)
o    Minor
o    Insane

·         If it’s based on a primary evidence = same way as legitimate child
·         If it’s based on a secondary evidence = within the lifetime of the parent
Who may bring the action
·         GR: Child himself
·         E: Transmitted to its heirs should the child die:
o    Minor
o    Insane
o    Child dies after instituting the action
·         FC 175 states that it may be “established in the same way as a legitimate child”. It may be inferred that as long as the action is based on primary evidence it may be transmitted to the heirs of the child.




[1] Types of Evidence to prove filiation
A.     Primary
1.        Record of birth in civil register or final judgments
2.        Admission of legitimate filiation in a public document or a private handwritten instrument signed by the parent concerned

B.     Secondary
1.        Open and continuous possession of the status of a legitimate child
2.        Other means allowed by the rules of court and special laws
o    Baptismal certificate of child
o    Judicial admission
o    Family bible wherein the name of the child is entered
o    Common reputation respecting pedigree
o    Admission by silence
o    Testimonies of witnesses
o    Other kinds of proof admissible under Rule 130 of the Revised Rules of Court

0 comments:

Post a Comment